Doctors will no longer encourage gender-curious children to use preferred pronouns or dress as opposite sex under NHS guidelines
- NHS to consider risks of social transition in youth questioning gender identity
- Social transitioning can include changing name, pronouns, and crossdressing
- New guidelines say it can have significant effects it on a child’s psychology
- They also say most children will not commit to gender changes in their teens
Doctors will no longer encourage gender-curious children to use the pronouns of their preferred identity.
New NHS draft guidelines will also discourage the act of children dressing in clothes of the opposite sex.
Health chiefs say ‘social transitioning’ should be no longer be viewed as a ‘neutral act’ due to the significant effects it may have on a child’s psychology.
Social transitioning refers to a person being treated as the gender different to their biological sex but without medical interventions like controversial puberty blockers or hormones.
This can see people change their name, their pronouns and dress in clothes usually associated with their opposite sex.
Their family, friends and school are encouraged to be supportive of this process.
At the extreme end of the scale, social transitioning can see people controversially use the bathrooms or changing facilities of their believed gender identity.
But now NHS England’s draft approach calls on clinicians to recognise most cases of ‘gender incongruence’ in children are just a phase.
‘The clinical approach in regard to pre-pubertal children will reflect evidence that in most cases gender incongruence does not persist into adolescence,’ it reads.
Therefore, it says encouraging social transitioning for prepubescent children should be considered carefully due to the mental health risks posed to the child when they reach their teenage years.
‘The clinical approach has to be mindful of the risks of an inappropriate gender transition and the difficulties that the child may experience in returning to the original gender role upon entering puberty if the gender incongruence does not persist into adolescence,’ it reads.
Even for older children, those already in their adolescence, social transitioning should only be considered a last resort in severe cases.
‘Social transition should only be considered where the approach is necessary for the alleviation of, or prevention of, clinically significant distress or significant impairment in social functioning and the young person is able to fully comprehend the implications of affirming a social transition,’ the draft reads.
Stella O’Malley, psychotherapist and director of campaign group Genspect, said medics needed to take heed of warnings over social transitioning.
‘Professionals working with children need to reflect on that and make sure they aren’t inadvertently causing harm by providing short term relief that leads to long term distress,’ she said.
‘At Genspect we believe that children should be free to wear whatever clothes they want, boys should be free to run around waving fairy wands in princess dresses and girls should be free to act however they wish, yet we don’t think changing pronouns helps anyone- it creates more problems than it resolves.’
The NHS England draft guidelines are part of the health service’s plan to close the highly-controversial Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) at the Tavistock clinic, the country’s only gender identity service for children.
GIDS is scheduled to shut its doors in the spring after a review ruled that the service was unsafe.
It found that other mental health issues were ‘overshadowed’ in favour of gender identity treatment, prompting accusations that staff rushed children onto powerful drugs.
As part of its response NHS England said GIDS would be replaced with two services one in London and one in the North West.
The new London service will be run by a partnership between Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and Evelina London Children’s Hospital.
In the North West, the service will be a partnership between Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust and Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital.
After these initial two, a further six or seven similar services could be opened in other parts of the country.
These services would operate under the draft documents now up for public consultation.
Other changes in the draft include a clampdown on referrals to gender identity care.
Under current guidelines, health and social service staff, teachers, and charities can refer a child they think is suffering from gender dysphoria to specialist NHS care.
But in the new system referrals to NHS gender identity care would be restricted to just GPs and health service staff.
Other sections of the draft also detail that puberty blockers should only be provided via an NHS research programme, and medics should consider safeguarding processes if children obtain such drugs online.
The documents released yesterday also show that least 15 children under the age of four were directed to the NHS’s transgender health service in England in the past two years.
A similar number of five-year-olds were referred between 2021-2022 at GIDS.
NHS documents state that in total over 5,000 children were referred to Tavistock’s service in the past two years, over concerns they were suffering from their gender identity not matching their biological sex.
Only half of referrals were for children aged 15-plus.
Patients currently being treated at Tavistock’s Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) will have their care transferred to the new operators early next year.
NHS England’s draft guidelines are in response to an ongoing review of GIDS by senior paediatrician Dr Hilary Cass, who warned the gender clinic was ‘not a safe or viable long-term option’.
She found other mental health issues were ‘overshadowed’ in favour of gender identity issues when children were referred to Tavistock.
The clinic had been accused of rushing children onto puberty blocking drugs by former patients who feel they weren’t challenged enough.
Dr Cass has called for ‘rapid’ research on the use of the drugs after she found ‘insufficient evidence’ on their benefits.
GIDS has found itself facing increasing scrutiny in recent years, with campaigners accusing it of rushing children onto puberty blocking drugs.
Former patient Keira Bell took the clinic to the High Court in 2020, claiming that she had not been challenged enough when she was prescribed the drugs at age 16.TIOB News